Still, they keep the ability to use that content. Con: You own it, but Spotify can use itĪnchor emphasizes users’ ability to retain ownership of everything they make. This can be helpful for podcasters learning about how to distribute. Now, they require you to manually enable RSS and submit your feed to each directory, but they still keep them all in one place. Pro: Distribution to appsīefore Spotify’s acquisition, Anchor would automatically upload your podcast to many services, including Apple Podcasts. Those working with longer episodes or larger file formats may need to compress to use Anchor. You can also only upload files of up to 250MB. Group and solo recordings can’t exceed two hours apiece. There are limits, however, on how much you can record and upload at a time. Anchor lets you host as many episodes as you want, with no true limits on how long they can be. Many free trials and unpaid versions of podcast hosting services place limits on how much you can distribute. Sources say they’ll eventually roll out a cut for paid subscriptions as well. However, Spotify takes a 30% cut of all ad revenue. Con: Spotify still takes a cutĪnchor’s built-in ad platform makes it easy to monetize, and they also offer paid subscriptions. It’s a great option for people who can’t yet afford to invest in their podcasting interest. This sets them apart from major players like Buzzsprout and Podbean. Under their current model, you’ll never have to pay for Anchor. Sound too good to be true? Here are some positives and negatives of Anchor’s service. Anchor touts its ability to upload your podcast to all major listening apps for free.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |